Media Barred From Parliament Lobby (Part 4)

Ok, this may not be the best part but it is a sign that the best part is not that far away from us. The idiot bugger brainless Minister, Nazri Aziz criticised the move by the BBC in removing the barricade restricting the reporters from the Parliament lobby. In his critics, he was alleged to have accused the BBC members of being childish and gangster-like in removing the red tape placed as barricade at Parliament lobby on Tuesday.

In response to the brainless bugger Nazri's uncalled remark, the BBC Chairman Tiong King Sing said the backbenchers felt insulted by Nazri’s remarks, adding that the BBC had checked with both Speaker Tan Sri Pandikar Amin Mulia and Nazri and both were not aware of the barricade.
Tiong had also said the BBC would hold a meeting on Monday to discuss the issue and decide on the next course of action to be taken, as they felt Nazri had gone overboard.

Now, in response to the BBC's response, this bugger Nazri had this to say: -

“I am expecting the BBC to recommend to Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi to sack me as a minister. If they dare not do that on Monday, then shut up and don’t talk anymore,’’.

Click here http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2008/6/27/nation/20080627174504&sec=nation

For the second time, this bugger Nazri has again shown his immaturity and stupidity in dealing with the pressure (not really a pressure for me) after he claimed earlier that (refer to my same posting under Part 3) he was just an intermediary between the Executive and the Legislative and he has nothing to do with the ban.

Now, my conclusion thus far are: -

(1) This bugger Nazri is mentally retarded;

(2) He is childish and his response was a gangster-like because he seems to be overreact and unable to cope with the misunderstanding between all the parties when he challenged the BBC to recommend to Si Bedol who is 2x5 with him to sack him as a Minister;

(3) This bugger Nazri thought that he is untouchable but least that he knows that he is actually vulerable;

(4) Should the BBC really make a move to ask Si Bedol to sack him as a Minister this Monday and Si Bedol, knowing very well that he needs someone idiot like Nazri to please him, refuse to sack the bugger Nazri (as expected), I now dare Nazri to tell Si Bedol to shut up and don't talk anymore (I dare to bet people like Nazri who has no balls won't make such a move. If he dares not to ask Si Bedol to shut up, then I am telling him right here right now that he has to shut up and do not talk anymore;

(5) This bugger Nazri knows it very well that Si Bedol can't live without him and that was why he dared to challenge the BBC to ask Si Bedol to sack him. Further, he also knows it very well that the BBC are mature and smart MPs, thus they will not make such a move;

(6) To certain extent, I do think that my theory about Si Bedol appointed him (bugger Nazri) as a Minister to be in charge of Parliament (equivalent to Building Manager or perhaps in charge of maintenance...hahaha...but the salary is too high la Bedol) to meet his (Nazri) greed is with some basis;

(7) At last the BN MPs realised that this bugger Nazri is useless, stupid, idiot so on and so forth after people like you and me realised it long time ago. But better late than never; and

(8) If there are a phyton and this bugger Nazri in front of me, I would rather kill Nazri first before the phyton. Reason being, the damage that the phyton would cause is very minimal as compared to this bugger Nazri who is able to cause damage substantially.

Feel free to add to my conclusion if you feel that I overlook some.

On another note, I was a practising lawyer for almost four (4) years. Before I went into and during my practice days, I always thought that all lawyers are smart and intelligent professionals but not until I came to know that Nazri is a lawyer by profession and he used to be in practice. He is a disgrace to the legal profession.

The drama is not far from over. Let us see what happen on Monday.

In a nutshell, Nazri Aziz is bangang.

Media Barred From Parliament Lobby (Part 3)

Finally the brainsless Nazri Aziz made a statament on the ban issue. On the issue of banning the journalist, he had this to say: -

“I am the intermediary between the legislative and the executive, I am not involved.”

When asked about limiting the number of jounalist from the same press into the Parliament sitting, he had this to say: -

"Five is more than enough. If five is not enough then something is wrong with you all. It shows you are not efficient. It’s as simple as that".

Click here http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2008/6/24/parliament/21635837&sec=parliament and here http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2008/6/25/nation/21648763&sec=nation

In one instance, he knew what was going on and in another instance, which was interrelated with the first instance, he said he was just an intermediary and he does not involve. What a brainless statement from a brainless minister who does not have the intellectual faculty in him!!!

I called upon Si Bedol to strip this bugger Nazri Aziz from his ministerial post and that ten of thousand of RM paid to him every month can be used for better purpose.

Media Barred From Parliament Lobby (Part 2)

If you have read my earlier posting on the same issue, you would have agreed with me that "security" was an excuse and not a reason. It was just a cheap effort by Nazri Aziz to champion si Bedol. Perhaps because his name has not appeared in the newspaper for quite sometime, so he decided to do something, though stupid, to get the attention and cheap publicity.

So, at 2.15pm today, Bung Mokhtar the deputy Chairman BBC removed the barricade to allow the journalists to move freely as before. So now no more security issue? Well, they have to do that because the journalists have boycotted all the press conference. Hahahaha...

Let us wait and see Nazri's comment (another stupid comment to cover the earlier stupid instruction) on the latest move made by Bung Mokhtar to defy his stupid instruction.

Media Barred From Parliament Lobby

It was reported today that administration of Parliament has ban reporters in most areas in the Parliament such as the lounge meant for MPs, cubicles for ministers, the bridge linking lobby to the next building where Prime Minister’s Office is located, mobile post offices and ATM machines. My, my, my...can't go to post office and withdraw money at ATM machine? This is too much right? But what was the motive behind the ban? According to Parliament administration, the ban was due to security reason. But what type of security? Any bomb threat? Any murder threat towards the MP? Why only now Parliament feels there is a security concern and not before? Why only after opposition won 82 seats and proposal for motion of no-confidence against the PM and not before? Is this another attempt to undermine our intellectual? I guess so because the instruction must come from none others than then the shallow minded Minister in the PM's Department who is in charge only for Parliament, the brainless Nazri Aziz.

It was also reported that the number of press conferences held at the lobby has increased recently with the stronger opposition in the Parliament. More ministers have been holding press conferences at the lobby. NGOs too have been meeting up with MPs at the lobby area. So, is this the "security" that they are talking about? I believe so. Well you know Nazri Aziz. How far can he thinks? Is it really security issue or just to please Si Bedol, so that Si Bedol always think that he is still popular to lead the government because with such ban, only five (5) journist are allowed to cover the Parliament. I guess with those five (5) journalist, is would be easier for Nazri to control the "actual" informaton from leaking out. But if the journalists are "threat" to Parliament, what about the public citizen who can go to Parliament to watch the debate? Does the ban also extended to them meaning they also canot go to ATM and post office? May be Nazri overlook on this aspects because if public citizen are allowed to enter the area banned for the journalists, then "security" is just an excuse. The journalists threatened to boycott Parliament sitting. There you go. Go ahead with the boycott. If they want to filter the information, let them just keep all the information with them. You guys can go somewhere else to get more interesting news that dealing with all these buggers. Click here http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2008/6/24/nation/20080624111845&sec=nation

Whatever it is, only recently I came to know that Nazri Aziz is a Minister in Malaysia in charge of only one (1) building i.e. Parliament. I can't help my self but laughing like hell. Do we need a inister to be in charge of Parliament? Or is it one of the ways for Si Bedol to entertain the greedy by giving any ministerial post though such a post is not needed? I mean like what he promised to Yong Teck Lee? Shame on Si Bedol and especially Nazri Aziz. I still can't accept the fact that we need a full Minister to be in charge of Parliament. Perhaps Si Bedol still needs Nazri around because people like Nazri is able to make him happy and feel popular all the times and is always there to protect him (Bedol) but Si Bedol just could not find a suitable ministerial post to give to Nazri, as all ministerial posts requirethe incumbent to think and think and think, the crucial and critical part in human's ability that Nazri does not possess So, in the end, oklah Nazri, you take on Parliament, as you do not have to think and that position does not require you to issue intellectual statement. It is a waste of public fund to pay people like Nazri when we already have Zaid Ibrahim, Hamid Othman when we already have Zahid Hamidi and Sahrizat when we already have Ng Yen Yen. The country can save thousands of RM a month from the three stooges' monthly salary and allowances (minus the 10% cut on entertainment allowance, which is peanut - do you know that the 10% cut for the PM is not even RM2k?) and that will come about a million in one year and few more millions in four to five years.

Pandikar Amin Quits as Kota Marudu UMNO Chief

Read here http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2008/5/16/nation/21270851&sec=nation

I supposed it is a good thing to do. In order for him to be impartial in chairing the meeting, he needs to be sort of “independent” and not tide to any political party or any fraction in the parliament. Whatever it is, while it is important for the Speaker to be impartial, it is more important for him to be seen to be impartial.

Let us hope that this is the beginning of more positive and good things to happen. Thumbs up for Tan Sri Pandikar Amin Mulia.